Certyo/v1
Comparison

Certyo vs Azure Confidential Ledger

Microsoft's TEE-based ledger offers hardware-backed isolation. But vendor lock-in, scale limits, and opaque verification create real trade-offs for regulated operations.

What is Azure Confidential Ledger?

Azure Confidential Ledger (ACL) is a managed, decentralized ledger built on Microsoft Research's Confidential Consortium Framework (CCF). It runs exclusively on hardware-backed Trusted Execution Environments (Intel SGX enclaves), providing tamper-proof, append-only storage.

ACL's unique value is hardware-level trust exclusion: TLS terminates inside the enclave, and not even Microsoft cloud operators can access data during processing. Each transaction produces a cryptographic receipt backed by the Merkle tree data structure.

What ACL does well

  • TEE hardware isolation: Intel SGX enclaves ensure that data in processing is protected from cloud operator insiders — the strongest confidentiality guarantee available.
  • Immediate immutability: Writes are immutable on commit, with no waiting period for batch accumulation or blockchain confirmation.
  • Azure ecosystem integration: Native integration with Azure SQL Ledger, Azure Blob Storage, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud.

Limitations and lock-in

Despite its strong isolation model, ACL has significant constraints for teams operating across clouds or needing vendor-neutral evidence:

  • Azure lock-in: ACL works only within Azure. Organizations on AWS, GCP, or on-premises cannot use it. Multi-cloud architectures are excluded entirely.
  • Scale constraints: Limited to 2 ledger instances per subscription, 50,000 collection IDs per ledger, and 1,800 writes per second. Requesting higher limits requires contacting Microsoft directly.
  • Opaque verification: Verification requires Azure API access. Third-party auditors, regulators, or partners need Azure credentials to validate integrity — no public proof exists.
  • Survivability risk: If Microsoft discontinues ACL (as AWS did with QLDB), all data and proofs become inaccessible. There is no independent verification path.

Where Certyo wins

Certyo takes a fundamentally different approach: instead of trusting a cloud provider's hardware to protect your data, it makes proof public and platform-independent.

  • Public verifiability: Anyone can verify a record's integrity using PolygonScan and an IPFS gateway — no Certyo account, API key, or platform access needed.
  • Zero data custody: Certyo stores SHA-256 hashes, not your actual data. This eliminates the PHI/PII custody concern entirely, simplifying HIPAA and GDPR compliance.
  • Vendor-neutral permanence: On-chain anchors on Polygon and IPFS manifests persist even if Certyo ceases operations. Your proof outlives the platform.
  • Full multi-tenancy: Tenant + client sub-partitioning, 8 RBAC roles, per-API-key rate limiting, and complete audit isolation — built for SaaS-grade operations.

Feature comparison

CapabilityCertyoAzure ACL
Trust modelDecentralized (Polygon + IPFS)Semi-decentralized (TEE enclaves)
Public verifiabilityPolygonScan + IPFSNo —Requires Azure API access
TEE isolationNo —Not applicableIntel SGX enclaves
Data custodyHash-only (zero PHI/PII)Full entry storage
Vendor lock-inNone (open protocols)Full (Azure only)
SurvivabilityOn-chain is permanentSingle vendor risk
Scale limitsKafka-parallelized (configurable)2 instances/sub, 1,800 TPS
Multi-tenancyFull (tenant + client + 8 RBAC roles)Basic (collection IDs)
Immutability latencyDeferred (~minutes)Immediate on commit
Evidence exportCompliance-ready packagesNo —Not available
Event streamingKafka-native pipelineNo —Synchronous API only
Rate limitingPer-API-key distributedSKU-level limits
PricingDeployment-flexible (self-hosted or managed; not per-record)~$90/month per instance
Retry & DLQExponential backoff + DLQNo —Not available
Cross-cloud supportAny cloud or on-premisesNo —Azure only

Need vendor-neutral integrity?

Talk to our team about adding publicly verifiable proof to your existing systems — works across any cloud.